The ‘Whys’ of Airline Safety Instructions September 27, 2008
Posted by Anurag Gaggar in Life, World, technology.Tags: airlines, safety, travel
4 comments
The airline safety instructions voiced over by air hostesses at the start of each flight are similar the world over, delivered in a typical monotonous tone and paid little attention to by frequent air travelers. My guess is most people don’t know the logic behind some of the instructions (at least, I didn’t) and how do they help. I looked up on the internet and found some answers.
1. Why do you have to keep your cell phone switched off during the course of the entire flight?
A. This one’s the most obvious instruction and the logic is understood by most people. Cell phones receive and transmit wireless signals and these signals can interfere with the aircraft communication systems.
2. Why do airline seats have to be in an upright position during takeoff/landing?
A. Air & Space magazine answers this one well.
There are two main reasons why flight attendants pester people to keep those seats up—to keep injuries to a minimum during a crash and to clear the maximum amount of space for a quick exit. When the seat is up, it is locked. When the seat is back, it’s not locked. In the event of an emergency, an unlocked seat has more force during impact, and the thrusting forward of that seat can cause passenger injury.
3. Why do you have to fold up your tray tables during takeoff/landing?
A. Same logic as above.
4. Why window shields have to be slid up during takeoff/landing?
A. This rule is in place to provide visibility into the aircraft during emergencies.
5. Why do you have to switch off all electronic equipment during takeoff/landing?
A. This one’s trickier. The rule to switch off cell phones is understandable, but why should other electronic equipments like iPods need to be switched off. After all, they do not transmit/receive any signals. Right? Wrong. An iPod and most electronic devices emit a small amount of RF signals (in case of a malfunction, the strength of the RF signals may go up). While a single iPod may not emit signals strong enough to cause interference with aircraft communication systems, a bunch of them running together might (the chances are remote, but the airline companies don’t want to take a risk and face litigation).
Of science and solubility September 27, 2008
Posted by Anurag Gaggar in science.Tags: miscibility, science, solubility
add a comment
Overheard at a 10th grade science class.
[Teacher]: Why doesn’t diesel dissolve in, or mix with, water?
[Student]: Because diesel is lighter than water. When you mix the two of them, water being heavier settles down at the bottom and diesel forms a layer on the top.
[Teacher]: But, then why does ethanol (alcohol) mix with water? Even that is lighter than water.
[Student]: Umm… [long pause]. I think the difference in densities of ethanol and water isn’t as much as in the case of diesel and water.
[Teacher]: The density of water is 1 kg/l (at 4 degess celcius), diesel is 0.85 kg/l and ethanol is 0.79 kg/l, which means that ethanol is lighter than diesel and it still mixes with water. Isn’t that strange?
[Student]: If you say so. But, now can you tell me why?
[Teacher]: The reason that diesel and water do not mix with each other is that they are not miscible with each other. Miscibility is the property of liquids to mix in all proportions, forming a homogeneous solution. Water and ethanol, for example, are miscible since they mix in all proportions (you can mix one spoon of ethanol in a glass of water or one spoon of water in a glass of ethanol). In organic compounds, the weight percent of hydrocarbon chain often determines the compound’s miscibility with water. Got it?
[Student]: Yes, teacher!
Kya aap paanchvi metric paas se tez hain?
Trivia – Indian currency September 22, 2008
Posted by Anurag Gaggar in India, Trivia, economics.Tags: currency, government, India, rbi, Trivia
5 comments
The 1 Indian Rupee (INR) notes are no longer printed, but some of them are still in circulation. Have you noticed that these notes were issued by the Government of India while all others are issued by the Reserve Bank of India?
Why was it so?
As per the RBI website, the Government of India derives authority to issue Rupee coins from the Coinage Act. The One Rupee notes issued under the Currency Ordinance, 1940 are included in the expression Rupee coin for all the purposes of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and hence, were issued by the Government of India.
The Government of India, and not the Reserve Bank of India, is responsible for the minting and circulating coins.
So, what difference does it make?
I guess nothing much till one of them is bankrupt and the other is not, something unlikely to happen. But then, I said it was trivia


